Human resource assignment
MGB2430 A1 Essay Criteria Rubric
Section/Criteria % N (26-49%) Pass (50‐59%) Credit (60‐69%) Distinction (70‐79%) HighDistinction (80‐100%)
Introduction:
Introduces the topic in an interesting &
appropriate way. Defines the objective
&content of the essay. Provides a
perspective on the issue.
10
Inadequate with no
introduction of the
topic and/or any
objective and scope for
the essay stated.
Some introduction of the
topic and some statement of
the objective and scope but
not well expressed.
Generally good introduction
of the topic and quite
clearly stated objective for
the essay and a perspective
provided.
Well written introduction
and well stated objective for
the essay followed by some
provision of perspective on
the issue.
Excellent and interesting
introduction, with a clearly stated
objective for the essay followed by a
concise perspective on the issue.
Body:
(Do not use this word as a sub heading)
Each issue under investigation is
explained specifically and critically analysed. Arguments/viewpoints
supported by evidence from reference
material, data or examples. Logical
progression of ideas. Demonstrates a
high level of quality research into the
topic utilising academic sources of good quality and variety.
60
May not have
addressed the issues in
relation to the essay
topic or the discussion
is not supported
adequately either
through reasoning or
appropriate references.
A basic overview with
no analysis. Insufficient
research.
Discussion is adequate but
rather limited. Describes rather
than analyses. However it uses
some relevant references and
linking of theory and practice
in the discussion. Rather
limited evidence of quality
research.
Effective discussion
indicating some reasoning
and analysis using relevant
references. Links theory and
practice using relevant
literature and examples in
the arguments. Evidence of
some quality research.
Demonstrates evidence
from wider literature
research of high quality.
Discussion supports a
coherent line of reasoning.
Links theory and practice
with insightful analysis and
use of examples in the
arguments.
Excellent discussion supported by
quality research in the literature in
combination with the use of relevant
examples to support the arguments.
Conclusion:
All aspects drawn together in a brief, concise summary. Consistent with findings, no new material introduced but
may finish with some implications or a comment on the future of the issue.
10
Inadequate conclusion
with no summary of
issues that have been
discussed or
inconsistent with the
findings or new
material introduced.
Satisfactory conclusion but
could be done in a clearer or
more concise manner.
Good conclusion that
Summarises the main issues
in a clear and concise
manner.
Very clear and concise
conclusion including some
suggestions as to
implications or comments
on the future of the issue.
Excellent conclusion that is written
in a very concise, consistent manner
with comments in relation to
implications and the future of the
issue.
Presentation:
Quality of expression, grammar,
spelling, punctuation and
proofreading. Format and layout in
professional manner– including signed
assessment cover sheet.
10
Inappropriate/poor
language. Frequent
errors in grammar,
punctuation and/or
spelling. Poor format
and layout that do not
meet professional
expectations.
Adequate language but some
errors in grammar, punctuation
and/or spelling. Format and
layout satisfactory, but can be
presented more professionally.
Effective language. Mainly
accurate grammar,
punctuation and/or spelling.
Correct use of paragraph
constructions. Well
presented (size 12 font,
double spacing).
Well written with good
expression, grammar,
punctuation and spelling.
Good use of paragraph
constructions. Very well
presented.
Excellent expression, grammar,
spelling, punctuation with few
errors. Professional presentation in
relation to format and layout.
Referencing:
Use of correct author‐date (APA) referencing system in a consistent and
correct manner in the essay itself. Inclusion of an accurate reference list on a separate page listing only the sources
that have actually been used. The reference list is arranged in alphabetical order according to the authors’ last
names. (A-Z) No sections.
10
Inappropriate or
incorrect referencing
and/or no reference list.
Not consistent with the
Q Manual
requirements.
Work over‐relies on direct quotations. Some errors in
technical aspects of
referencing. May deviate from
Q Manual requirements.
Quotations and referencing
are mainly accurate. Work
shows some integration of
citations. Mostly correct
application of Q Manual
requirements.
Minor referencing errors.
Citations used to good effect utilising a mixture
of direct quotations and
paraphrasing. Meets Q Manual requirements.
Referencing is consistently accurate.
Citations used to support very well.
Insightful and interesting arguments.
Meets Q Manual requirements.
